Earlier on today the Judge Ratha Mokgoatlheng announced that they are going to postpone the crime case to further new day.
According to South_Africa_Updates: The judge emphasized the need to ensure that both parties are fully prepared before substantive evidence is presented.
Source revealed that: She turned to defense counsel Advocate Mnisi and asked him to confirm when he would be ready to proceed, underscoring the court’s commitment to fairness and procedural integrity.
Publication noted: Advocate Mnisi responded that he and his legal team required a short break to review documents and advise their client on strategic responses to developments.
Judge Mokgoatlheng paused the proceedings and granted Mnisi a fifteen-minute recess, directing that court reconvene in courtroom three at precisely 11:15 AM.
She reminded all parties that the efficient administration of justice depends on clear communication and adherence to court schedules.
The prosecution team, led by Senior State Advocate Naidoo, did not object to the brief recess.
In accompanying remarks, Naidoo noted that the prosecution’s evidence was organized and ready for presentation, pending the defense’s readiness.
He acknowledged that a prepared defense contributes to a smoother trial process and reduces the risk of unnecessary delays.
Both sides praised the judge’s balanced approach in managing courtroom resources and respecting each party’s procedural needs.
Legal experts caution that even brief adjournments can affect trial timelines, in courts with heavy caseloads.
They recommend that stakeholders anticipate possible date adjustments and logistical changes, including witness scheduling and resource allocation.
The court registry has stated that any further postponement requests must be submitted in writing at least twenty‑four hours before the next session.
Publication emphasized that: Observers in the public gallery and media praised the judge’s decision as a measure to safeguard due process.
Several analysts highlighted that modern trials often require counsel to consult witness statements and expert reports before critical hearings.
They noted that short breaks like this can prevent rushed arguments and help ensure that justice is served through thorough preparation rather than mere expediency.
The hearing is scheduled to resume at 11:15 AM, at which time Advocate Mnisi will inform the bench of his readiness to proceed.
The court’s docket indicates that the matter will continue with opening arguments, witness testimony, and the submission of evidence if all parties are prepared.
For real‑time updates on court proceedings and related developments, follow the official court news feed.
BY LUCKY SEANEGO
